- From: John Hicks <jwjhix@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:14:47 +0200
- To: Wilco Fiers <w.fiers@accessibility.nl>
- Cc: Birkir Gunnarsson <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>, "public-auto-wcag@w3.org" <public-auto-wcag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK8rWfdBAP1UvO_xjBjgfHj28y1N2-g6rYcRijhoHaLwGZKrSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Wilco, Of course you are right, it not an accessibility problem really. But Birkir and Anika opened up the conflict between F38 and F39 , and it just occured to me that this conflict is due to a short coming in allowing purely decorative instructions in the HTML... It is another topic, probably ; that of purely semantic markup being separated from form... I was getting ahead of myself. John On 23 October 2014 13:07, Wilco Fiers <w.fiers@accessibility.nl> wrote: > Hi John, > I agree that most of the time decorative images should be in CSS. However > that's not an accessibility problem, so I don't see how it relates to > 1.1.1. Can you clarify? > > Wilco > > > ________________________________________ > Van: John Hicks [jwjhix@gmail.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 23 oktober 2014 12:37 > Aan: Birkir Gunnarsson > CC: public-auto-wcag@w3.org > Onderwerp: Re: Unable to attend tomorrow 10/23 (the dog ate my homework) > > Happy Birthday Birkir! > > I probably won't make the call today either ... > > I was wondering if really the problem (open question) in SC 1.1.1 > regarding purely décorative images and F39 ... doesn't imply something > bigger ... that including purely decorative images (that have no roles of > any kind either) in your html code should really become as obsolete as > using the <center> tag ... > > Should not these images be in the page background specified in the > style-sheet? > > Just a thought. > > Until later everyone, > > John > > > > > > On 23 October 2014 03:48, Birkir Gunnarsson <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com > <mailto:birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>> wrote: > Hey guys > > No, we don’t have a dog, not even a guide dog. > Tomorrow is effectively my last day with a Deque corporate client that I > have worked with for over a year. > I am being moved to a new client, leading a support team. > Both clients are on the Fortune 500 list and are huge companies, needless > to say the work can get dicy. > So tomorrow, which is incidentally my birthday, I have been booked for 8 > hours of continuous meetings to hand over my projects. > 10/24 is effectively my last day at current client but by end of tomorrow > I will basically be done. > So 10/24 I am going to start out Twitter campaign and work on my issues, > so expect an email to the list. > Sorry for the late notice, but one never knows how the meeting schedule > works out, and I am not able to reschedule any meetings because of the > situation. Generally I keep our meeting spot open in my calendar.. > This one is nastier than I thought. > Behave kids, and don’t do anything I wouldn’t do. *grin* > Cheers > -Birkir > >
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 12:15:14 UTC