RE: review of contiguous IDL

I just went through the WebIDL as well.  I posted three comments, but suspect 2 of the 3 things I noted were intentional.  The other is a small unrelated typo.

From: Raymond Toy [mailto:rtoy@google.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:54 AM
To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
Cc: Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Subject: Re: review of contiguous IDL

Thanks for the review.

My current plan is to merge this to hte main branch on Wed morning (2017-09-20). Any remaining issues with the conversion will be fixed afterwards.

So if you want to make comments, please review before Wed morning (PDT time).

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com<mailto:joe@noteflight.com>> wrote:
Hi Raymond,

It turns out that I was able to get to this earlier than expected.

I only found one missing thing in the updated version, described here:

    https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/pull/1290#pullrequestreview-62899714


All other content has carried over.

Best,
.            .       .    .  . ...Joe

Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 21:59:51 UTC