- From: Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:52:59 -0800
- To: Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
- Cc: Hongchan Choi <hongchan@google.com>, Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 17:53:32 UTC
Is there a conclusion or consensus on this? I've been holding off reviewing the PR for this until we have a consensus on what the expected behavior is. On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Joe Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote: > > >> I spent a good chunk of my life with Max/MSP and I can tell the groove~ >> supports negative playback rate with looping. The reference might be >> incorrect - I just downloaded 7.3.3 and confirmed again; groove~ supports >> the negative playback and it runs like option (2). >> >> > That is very good to know. > > >> > Apple Logic X Pro (one of the most popular DAWs): loops are ignored >> when "Reverse" option is selected on an instrument zone (verified by trying >> it) >> >> From your mention of "an instrument zone", I believe you meant EXS24 >> sampler. The new Alchemy synth/sampler actually supports the reverse >> looping. >> > > Thanks, I don't know Alchemy very well yet. When it plays backward, does > the playhead get "trapped" inside the loop? > >> >> FWIW, Max/MSP's groove~ is the closest thing to our ABSN. We don't have >> to follow but I believe that's what most computer musicians (including >> myself) are expecting. >> > > Again, that's a great data point to have. > >
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2017 17:53:32 UTC