On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Josh Nielsen <jbneslein@gmail.com> wrote: > Because i am uploading the audio over the internet and need to keep the > filesize manageable. Even if that wasn't the case, if you have any need to > use a script processor node, you are likely to encounter performance issues > if the sample rate is too high. > If you're uploading audio over the network you probably want to use MediaRecorder to compress it, which would make the sample rate moot. Whether it make sense performance-wise to resample audio down for general script processing is unclear. I think it would depend on more details of the use-case. I hope that you can build a competitive resampler in JS these days, in which case it would not much help to do the resampling in the browser. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn
Received on Friday, 11 September 2015 05:39:28 UTC