Re: Updated AudioWorker proposal

I added a rough draft of the side-by-side version here:
http://cwilso.github.io/web-audio-api/, changes here:
https://github.com/cwilso/web-audio-api/commit/0c2d78226c5277cfcc8aee51b2e6d88bed540a27
.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I’ve updated my fork of the AudioWorker proposal at [1] to reflect my
> recent exchanges with Chris W. on the list. If you’re on the call today to
> discuss, this new draft is the starting point that I’m proposing.
>
> The changes since my last version of this proposal can be seen at [2].
>
> I have tried to pare back as much as possible, while sticking with the
> notion of AudioWorker as a factory object.
>
> Best,
>
> .            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
> *Joe Berkovitz*
> President
>
> *Noteflight LLC*
> Boston, Mass.
> phone: +1 978 314 6271
> www.noteflight.com
> "Your music, everywhere"
>
> [1] http://joeberkovitz.github.io/web-audio-api/
> [2]
> https://github.com/joeberkovitz/web-audio-api/commit/a3ef8ce4291ef95e62ba2521e78b9136d6ca7b3d
>
>
>