- From: James Ingram <j.ingram@netcologne.de>
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:48:12 +0200
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- CC: Tom White <twhite@midi.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
I think we need to distinguish very clearly between logos administered by the MMA (for use on hardware) and those administered by the W3C (for use on web sites). Hardware (MMA): The Web MIDI API has been developed to be a subset of the complete MIDI spec, so all hardware that can display the MMA's current logos is "ready for the web" or "conformant with the Web MIDI API". I see no reason to stop manufacturers emphasising the fact if they want to, but don't see the need for a special MMA logo for that. On the other hand, Tom's original question seems to mean that devices are being developed that *only* support the Web MIDI API, and that there is a need for an MMA logo that says that. (Such devices might be cheaper to develop.) The only objection that I can see, from the W3C's point of view, might be that the Web MIDI API may develop in future, to contain features not covered by existing hardware. Is the Web MIDI API currently cast in stone? The web (W3C): I think the Web MIDI App logo should be administered by the W3C, and have terms and conditions very similar to those of the HTML5 logo: http://www.w3.org/html/logo/faq.html So I've added (#1b, #2b, and #3b) to my suggestions file: http://james-ingram.de/demos/W3CWebMIDILogoSketches.png These logos use the HTML5 background colour, and just use a public domain font, so the W3C would not need to ask the MMA for permission to use them. I've kept the dimensions identical to those of the earlier sketches, so it would be very easy to replace the word 'MIDI' by the MMA's symbol, if they agreed. I'm not at all sure that the MMA would want to grant permission, given the HTML5 logo's terms and conditions, but maybe agreement could be reached somehow... That's something for the lawyers. As always, these sketches are meant to be the basis for discussion. The final logos should be made legible at all sizes: The contours should be sharper, and I could have used a different font. Regards, James
Received on Sunday, 19 April 2015 12:48:46 UTC