[CfC] Re: Consensus gathering for the Dezippering issue

On 3 Dec 2013, at 19:58, Chris Lowis <chris.lowis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the call the participants reached a consensus to:
> 1) Keep dezippering in the spec
> 2) Apply it universally to all parameters (such that there are no
> "edge cases" in the spec
> 3) Define it in terms of one of the other methods (probably
> exponentialRampToValueAtTime) to simplify the spec and also to
> indicate to developers how to achieve parameter changes without
> dezippering by using those methods directly.
> I think Olivier would like to consider this a Call for Consensus, so
> if I've missed anything, please say so. Otherwise, if we agree on the
> above approach then we can start turning this into a PR against the
> current spec.

Yes. Let's set a deadline on now()+1 week (that is 2013-12-11) for consensus on the approach.

By that I mean:

* Consensus on point 1) above
* Consensus on point 2) above
* Consensus in principle on point 3) above, excluding detailed agreement on how we will define it for each/all parameters.


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to

Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 10:53:03 UTC