- From: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:11:39 +0100
- Cc: Jens Nockert <jens@nockert.se>, Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>, Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, "public-audio@w3.org WG" <public-audio@w3.org>
Well, it's the first time I'm doing this, so please bare with me. The idea is basically to have technical discussions around a potential API. I don't see a problem with doing that around something looking like a spec (non standard-track of course), though. In fact, the Community and Business Group FAQ states, under "What is a W3C Community Group?": "A W3C Community Group is an open forum, without fees, where Web developers and other stakeholders develop specifications, hold discussions, develop test suites, and connect with W3C's international community of Web experts. Community Groups may produce Specifications; these are not standards-track documents but may become input to the standards process. [...]" /Marcus 2013/11/14 Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>: > If the goal of this group is to produced a specification, it really > shouldn't be done inside a Community Group. Community Groups are only > intended to produce Community Group Reports (e.g., a technology innovation > from a small set of developers). As per the W3C's guidelines, Community > Groups Reports are not standards-track documents. > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jens Nockert <jens@nockert.se> wrote: >> >> I signed up. >> >
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 18:12:34 UTC