On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:
> I like that you expressed an opinion again. But you were supposed to
> change your mind this time :)
>
My new tagline. :)
I’m not a fan of the dezippering property idea. I think the right thing to
> do is not to introduce another mode into the system, but introduce a really
> easy way to change properties with autodezippering in an imperative way:
>
> gainNode.gain.change(1);
>
> instead of
>
> gainNode.gain.value = 1
>
We have that - either way. It's either gainNode.gain.setValueAtTime() or
gainNode.gain.setTargetAtTime(). We don't need to add another method to
do that.
Oh… and not bury this important point 30 pages down :)
>
Wilson's rule of writing: The fact that everything in your spec is
important means everything should be in the first page. Good luck with
that font size. :)
-C