- From: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:06:56 +0200
- To: Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com>
- Cc: public-audio@w3.org, Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Message-ID: <CAJhzemWxC0P3qWV2wU=NVLjOfXQXjc7rjEqKW-3sQendGD9Uwg@mail.gmail.com>
On Oct 29, 2013 12:51 AM, "Raymond Toy" <rtoy@google.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Olivier Thereaux < Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> In the past few days, we have seen the bridge between our GitHub repositories and this mailing-list misused in a number of ways: >> >> * Replies to the mailing-list without any kind of signature, which would therefore appear as coming from, and being authored by the WG. e.g: >> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/104#issuecomment-27260032 > > > Ooops. > >> >> >> >> * Spam - see https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/104#issuecomment-27174608 >> >> These are very difficult to avoid, and in my opinion neither spam nor unwillingly anonymised contributions are acceptable. As a result, I have suspended notifications to this mailing-list address of activity on the WebAudio repositories. > > > +1 Yay! I like / +1! My inbox will be much less messy from now on. :) > >> >> >> I have contacted GitHub, in hope that they may know a better way around the problem. In the meantime, I strongly suggest that members and participants of this WG go and create an account on Github, and watch our repositories over at https://github.com/WebAudio >> > > So, if we want to discuss issues they should be done using the issue tracker on github? Or this mailing list? > > I'm a bit confused now on the exact process. > > Ray > >> >> If for some reason you are unable or unwilling to do so, please get in touch and we will look into the situation. I understand that the need for W3C participant to create and use an account on a separate, commercial platform may be disturbing to some. I hope we can continue using what generally seems to be a useful tool. >> >> Best, >> Olivier >> >> >> On 28 Oct 2013, at 21:45, W3C Audio Working Group Notifications < notifications@github.com> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Olivier Thereaux >> > <notifications@github.com>wrote: >> > >> > > Original comment < https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17366#0>by Ralph Giles on W3C Bugzilla. Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:44:31 GMT >> > > >> > > I noticed that Chrome's implementation has a number of oddities, like >> > > ducking the square wave to avoid clipping, and the triangle wave starting >> > > at a different phase than the others. >> > > >> > >> > Could we simplify this and say that all of the waveforms are odd functions? >> > All of the waveforms are currently odd functions except the triangle wave, >> > which is defined to be even in Chrome. >> >> >> >> >> >> ----------------------------- >> http://www.bbc.co.uk >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and >> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. >> If you have received it in >> error, please delete it from your system. >> Do not use, copy or disclose the >> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender >> immediately. >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails >> sent or received. >> Further communication will signify your consent to >> this. >> ----------------------------- >> >
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2013 17:07:23 UTC