Re: ML + GH issue tracker

On 16 Oct 2013, at 13:57, Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion about this. The mirroring of GH conversations on the ML ensures that the W3C keeps a record of the discussion and makes it easier for people who are not on GH to find and follow issues. That said, if the duplication is a pain for most, I could live with an alternative where we'd keep everything in GH and archive/mirror things in w3.org space on a regular basis.
>
> Other thoughts from the group?


Hearing nothing from the group, I'm going to assume everyone is happy with having GH mails sent to the list (except, obviously, when I spam everyone with a few thousand emails).

One note - if you are replying to such e-mails on the list, they will get mirrored on GitHub with W3CAudioWG replied", e.g.:
https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/244#issuecomment-25552994

It's a nice feature in a way, making sure conversations on the list also show on GH. The "W3CAudioWG replied" bit is unfortunate, but I'm sure we'll find a way to "sign" our messages in a way that makes it less confusing.

Olivier





-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 11:34:41 UTC