- From: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:19:18 +0200
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5236CD16.4020303@opera.com>
2013-09-16 00:44, Robert O'Callahan skrev: > The two options are basically "when AudioBufferSourceNode.buffer is > set" and "when AudioBufferSourceNode.start() is called". Do we have > consensus it should be the latter? That's what my proposal says, but > I've lost track of the discussion. > As I've said before, I think the former (buffer assignment) would make the interface slightly more explicit (which IMO is a good thing). On the other hand I can't really tell how much damage it would do in terms of breaking existing content. So, I can live with the latter option (on start()), but would prefer the former option. /Marcus > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny > eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha > iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e > tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt > hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * > * -- Marcus Geelnard Technical Lead, Mobile Infrastructure Opera Software
Received on Monday, 16 September 2013 09:19:52 UTC