W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: When should an AudioBufferSourceNode "acquire the contents" of its AudioBuffer?

From: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:19:18 +0200
Message-ID: <5236CD16.4020303@opera.com>
To: public-audio@w3.org
2013-09-16 00:44, Robert O'Callahan skrev:
> The two options are basically "when AudioBufferSourceNode.buffer is 
> set" and "when AudioBufferSourceNode.start() is called". Do we have 
> consensus it should be the latter? That's what my proposal says, but 
> I've lost track of the discussion.
>

As I've said before, I think the former (buffer assignment) would make 
the interface slightly more explicit (which IMO is a good thing). On the 
other hand I can't really tell how much damage it would do in terms of 
breaking existing content.

So, I can live with the latter option (on start()), but would prefer the 
former option.

/Marcus


> Rob
> -- 
> Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny  
> eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha 
> iids  teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  
> tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt 
> hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp  waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w *
> *


-- 
Marcus Geelnard
Technical Lead, Mobile Infrastructure
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 16 September 2013 09:19:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:25 UTC