W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: References for helping me to implement dynamic range compression

From: Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:45:27 +0200
Message-ID: <521F4267.5010405@mozilla.com>
To: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
On 29/08/2013 14:15, Marcus Geelnard wrote:
> Your case is a very good example of why such behavior should be
> specified normatively in the specification (i.e. the C++ source code of
> a particular implementation can not act as a replacement for a proper
> specification). The underspecified DynamicsCompressorNode is a known
> issue, see: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17362 (which
> has not yet been addressed).
> I think/hope that this group will focus more on fixing spec issues soon
> (once we have the data race issue out of the way).

Indeed, fixing "spec holes" is the next priority (short and mid-term
goals) in terms. I started to triage spec bugs to get a sense of the
size of the task. We have a certain backlog to process (140 open spec
bugs, and quite a few decision made by email that haven't been reflected
in the spec, which forces us to cross check the spec and the email
threads, which is a pain).

Hopefully this situation won't happen in the future.

Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 12:45:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:23 UTC