- From: s p <sebpiq@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:46:44 +0400
- To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Cc: Paul Adenot <paul@paul.cx>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 19:47:11 UTC
> it's relatively non-obvious how to show a meter of reduction It is equally non-obvious to show a level-meter for example. But rather easy in fact with a ScriptProcessorNode, ... I would say it is even less obvious how to use a read-only monitor value as the input for a param or node. >From a dsp perspective, I certainly prefer having a control signal as output, that I can plug-in to another node. As there is no good solution, probably the one that is the most consistent with the spec is the nicest! I cannot think of a place where a "dsp" read-only value is provided (except in AudioParam) ... but I cannot think of a node that outputs a control signal either. 2013/8/28 Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:20 PM, s p <sebpiq@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > We would still make the reduction a read only float, because it would >> really be a monitoring value. >> >> If you want to make an envelope follower, an output would probably be >> more useful, as you could plug-it directly to a gain for example. >> > > Although that's true, one problem is that it's relatively non-obvious how > to show a meter of reduction (or overall volume, for that matter). The > reduction output as a read only floating-point value is valuable for that > purpose. >
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2013 19:47:11 UTC