- From: Chris Lowis <Chris.Lowis@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:18:07 +0000
- To: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
> I don't think it's fair to have a vote-off between two well-specified options and one vague option. This is a good point. If we go to a vote it needs to be clear what people are voting on and what the implications will be. > If no-one cares enough to specify it properly, it shouldn't be on the ballot. I think given the heat of this discussion so far, it would be unfair to say that "no-one cares". I appreciate how frustrating it is to not be able to make progress, but given the strongly entrenched positions on some sides of this debate I think it's fair to say that the result of any vote will be divisive. While there may still be a possibility for us to reach consensus, or at least to have all options more clearly specified, we should hold off on the vote. Trust me, I want us to reach a decision on this issue and move on as we have so much work to do in other areas, but at this time of year (my co-chair is on leave for the next few days for example), we may need to continue to be patient. I thank you and everyone else involved in working towards a solution to this issue for your hard work. Cheers, Chris ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Friday, 9 August 2013 09:18:36 UTC