Re: [webaudioapi] References.

Yes, I agree.  We should do a better job at referencing other specs.  The
Web IDL conformance is (should be?) normative, as that is the point of
using Web IDL in the first place.  :-)

Cheers,

--
Ehsan
<http://ehsanakhgari.org/>


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> I noted that the reference sections are quite empty, it's missing some
> important normative references as well as many informative ones.
>
> As an example, WebIDL is used to describe things like [1], there are two
> issues here:
> 1/ WebIDL is not in the normative references
> 2/ It is not clear which level of WebIDL conformance is required by the
> specification for implementation (See [2] for the different conformance
> classes available).
>
> On the informative front, the abstract talks about canvas and webgl, good
> candidates for informative refs.
> Thanks,
>
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/**raw-file/tip/webaudio/**
> specification.html#**OfflineAudioContext-section<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#OfflineAudioContext-section>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#**conformance<http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#conformance>
>
> --
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>
>         ~~Yves
>
>
>