- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:03:52 +0200
- To: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-audio@w3.org WG" <public-audio@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Philip, good to have you back. > > On 29 Jul 2013, at 08:42, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: >>> >>> * There will be a single question put to the vote. Voters will chose one of three options : >>> [snip] >> >> I would suggest instead that every voter rates the three options >> (allowing the same rating for multiple choices) and that some >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method is used to pick a >> winner. (I've used https://github.com/bradbeattie/python-vote-core and >> Schulze before.) >> >> (A strictly ranked system would also be far better than a single vote, >> even if it's not a Condorcet method.) > > > I have confirmed that the W3C polling system does indeed give us the ability to run a rank-ordering vote. It does sound like a better way of running the vote. We'll go for that. Excellent, thanks for checking! Philip
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2013 09:04:24 UTC