- From: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:26:32 -0400
- To: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANTur_4VhBGOXNFcZO3JzcoDMTjBaHm5kT51Zf36WHOphGi+Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi everyone, Given today's teleconf <http://www.w3.org/2013/06/20-audio-minutes.html>, let's see if we can reach consensus on a few issues. I would appreciate if everybody gave their opinion on the following. Note that this only concerns the unprefixed AudioContext API in all three engines, not webkitAudioContext in Blink and WebKit. I would appreciate if you can respond to each proposal individually (i.e., it's OK to agree with one and not with the other.) 1. I propose that we should remove this section < https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#OldNames> from the spec, and any AudioContext implementation should not implement those names. If we get consensus on this, I will create a porting guide documentation on MDN to help authors port their old content. We can mention the monkey patching library etc in that article, and make it really useful for web developers. 2. I propose that we should remove the following AudioContext API: AudioBuffer? createBuffer(ArrayBuffer buffer, boolean mixToMono); If we get consensus about this, I will add this API to the aforementioned article. 3. I need to write a separate proposal about the data race issues to make sure that I'm not missing anything. I'll try to do that tomorrow. 4. I propose that we agree that other than these changes, we start to consider the API stable, with the caveats about the upcoming LC stage that Olivier mentioned today in mind. This means that I'm withdrawing my other proposals about stylistic changes to the APIs, as I'm not very hopeful that we can reach consensus over those in a reasonable time frame. If you have any questions, please let me know. I really appreciate if you can respond in a timely manner, as it seems like most of the involved browser vendors are very interested on reaching a consensus on these issues very soon. Cheers, -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 23:27:38 UTC