Re: Analyzer vs Analyser

In the spirit of last week's decision to support equally old and new
names, I suspect we'll have to support both spellings here…

Olivier - somewhat accidental member of the british cabal.

On 01/04/2013 23:26, "Joe Berkovitz" <joe@noteflight.com> wrote:

>I strongly suspect the BBC cabal in the WG has quietly failed to act, in
>the hope that this Anglicism will somehow survive. (Let's ignore the fact
>that one of them is actually French.)
>
>
>Nice try, but fat chance, lads. This must be fixed!
>
>
>+1
>
>.            .       .    .  . ...Joe
>
>
>Joe Berkovitz
>President
>Noteflight LLC
>+1 978 314 6271
>www.noteflight.com <http://www.noteflight.com>
>"Your music, everywhere."
>
>
>On Apr 1, 2013, at 6:10 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
>wrote:
>
>
>
>Why is AnalyserNode not AnalyzerNode? For better or worse, Web specs use
>US English spellings (e.g. color, behavior). How did this  exception
>creep in?
>
>Rob
>--
>q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q
>qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq
>qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q
>qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq
> qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq
>qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q
>qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
>
>
>
>
>




-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2013 10:18:45 UTC