- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 17:38:10 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20510 --- Comment #7 from Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> --- (In reply to comment #6) > I still don't see why this is a benefit (allowing "any"). This seems like > being overly permissive (no checks), but there's one narrow "magic correct" > version (an array of something that's actually numbers) that will actually > work. The others are just degenerate non-functional oddities. > > Also - then I presume > > .send( 0xf8 ) > > would actually work. No, you just get an array with 240 zeros in it :) > (Sends a Timing Clock message "tick".) that seems to > me like it will continually re-open the question of "why doesn't send( 0x90, > 0x40, 0x7f ) work again?" Ok, then lets just go with the sequence: sequence<octet> data And let WebIDL do its magic on each item of the array: http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#es-octet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 December 2012 17:38:11 UTC