- From: Marcos Caceres <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:24:05 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
Hi, I'm a bit confused… why does the API require a timestamp relative to some time (i.e., performance.now())? For example: output.send(data, performance.now() + time); It seems to me that it would be better to just let the second argument be a delay (as a high resolution timestamp): //wait a few millis output.send(data, millis); The problem is that timestamps in the past always resolve to 0 (i.e., play now!), so seems kinda pointless to rely on a timestamp. What am I missing? -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 19:24:35 UTC