- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:50:45 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19975 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #12) > Still, it's quite an advanced usage, I'd say. Rather than cluttering up all > webmidi receivers, we could provide a method in MIDIInput like > "getQueuedMessageCount" which tells you if there are still messages > immediately following the current one. Now the basic webmidi receivers will > not use it and benefit from the simplifications proposed by Chris. And the > advanced applications can cache all queued messages until there are no > queued messages anymore, and then process them at once, possibly eliminating > redundant or outdated messages. > > Would that be a solution? Or, as Chris suggested, we could go with the simplified single message proposal for now, and consider adding an additional event handler called "onmessages" to a future version, letting the developer choose the tradeoff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 December 2012 21:50:47 UTC