- From: Patrick Borgeat <patrick.borgeat@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:30:54 +0100
- To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Cc: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 20:31:21 UTC
Sounds awesome! 2012/11/26 Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> > Yeah, .phaseOffset is really what it needs to be I think. This would be > additive with the cummulative phase from .frequency (and .detune). This > seems nice since if you set .frequency to 0, then there would be no > cummulative phase and you could control the phase directly with > .phaseOffset. How does that sound?
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 20:31:21 UTC