Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Jussi Kalliokoski <
jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wanted to check on the status of Web MIDI API implementation from
> browser vendors. As far as I know, there are no started efforts and
> especially not complete implementations around yet, but I'm curious to hear
> even if anyone has plans regarding this. I'm also curious to know which
> parties aren't planning to implement (any time soon), possible reasons, and
> if it's just that they haven't had the time to check the spec yet. Even if
> you aren't interested in the API at all (which I doubt, but be honest), I
> want to know so we can talk about it.
>
> If the WG is to meet the previously discussed milestones for the Web MIDI
> API, IMHO we would need at least one implementation to run against the spec
> to have a clearer map of the problems there might be. I know that at least
> Mozilla has some student project connections and I think that this spec
> might be a great target for a student project. :)
>

To be honest, I think Web Audio is a much higher priority for us and for
the Web in general. So any resources that I have influence over I'll be
pointing in that direction.

Rob
-- 
Jesus called them together and said, “You know that the rulers of the
Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority
over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among
you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your
slave — just
as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his
life as a ransom for many.” [Matthew 20:25-28]