- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:32:12 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17396-5429-goUILctylA@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17396
Marcus Geelnard (Opera) <mage@opera.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mage@opera.com
--- Comment #5 from Marcus Geelnard (Opera) <mage@opera.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> 1. using maxNumberOfChannel or using an array of layout. I think current
> spec using maxNumberOfChannel is reasonable.
As long as the specification is clearer about what should happen when setting
numberOfChannels to an unsupported number of channels. For instance: if the
supported channel counts are 2 and 6, then maxNumberOfChannels should return 6,
but what must happen if you set numberOfChannels to 1, 3, 4 or 5?
And I still believe that there must be a better way to signal "read only" than
to have '0' as a magic constant. In fact, "read only" only means that there is
a single allowed configuration (e.g. 2 for a stereo only context).
> 2. Exception handling. (automatic down/up mixing or throw exception?). I
> prefer to automatic mixing.
Dito.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 14:32:22 UTC