- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:32:12 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17396-5429-goUILctylA@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17396 Marcus Geelnard (Opera) <mage@opera.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mage@opera.com --- Comment #5 from Marcus Geelnard (Opera) <mage@opera.com> --- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. using maxNumberOfChannel or using an array of layout. I think current > spec using maxNumberOfChannel is reasonable. As long as the specification is clearer about what should happen when setting numberOfChannels to an unsupported number of channels. For instance: if the supported channel counts are 2 and 6, then maxNumberOfChannels should return 6, but what must happen if you set numberOfChannels to 1, 3, 4 or 5? And I still believe that there must be a better way to signal "read only" than to have '0' as a magic constant. In fact, "read only" only means that there is a single allowed configuration (e.g. 2 for a stereo only context). > 2. Exception handling. (automatic down/up mixing or throw exception?). I > prefer to automatic mixing. Dito. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 14:32:22 UTC