- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:20:56 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17396-5429-p3Dha9XjZc@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17396 Wei James <james.wei@Intel.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |james.wei@Intel.com --- Comment #4 from Wei James <james.wei@Intel.com> --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > As Marcus pointed out in > > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0355.html>, > > maxNumberOfChannels doesn't seem to really work and an array of values would > > make more sense. > > Would the proposed resolution of Bug #17379 resolve this as well? > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17379#c2 the proposal in Bug #17379 seems only resolve the naming issue of channel layout. there are still two issues here: 1. using maxNumberOfChannel or using an array of layout. I think current spec using maxNumberOfChannel is reasonable. 2. Exception handling. (automatic down/up mixing or throw exception?). I prefer to automatic mixing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 10:20:58 UTC