Re: [Bug 19561] WaveTable is poorly named from Stuart Memo on 2012-10-17 (public-audio@w3.org from October to December 2012)

From: Stuart Memo <stuartmemo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:52:07 +0100
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: public-audio@w3.org, jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com
Message-ID: <CAHZEqmocKA4jKZwx0ifnJYYhhaQB82NczT=kE9OJGSNcC4hd1g@mail.gmail.com>

What about AdjustTable?

You know, cos the values are adjustable.

Don't worry, I'm banning myself from ever posting again.

On 17 October 2012 15:28, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:

> On 17/10/2012 15:21, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
>
> > What about FormantTable?
>
> Formant implies an _absolute_ frequency.
>
> The WaveTable entries are harmonics, i.e. _relative_ to the oscillator's
> current fundamental frequency.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 14:52:43 UTC