- From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:52:27 +0100
- To: public-audio@w3.org
On 17/10/2012 09:16, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: > I think I'm with Chris Wilson here. I find it a bit counterintuitive to have > "Wave" in the name at all, since to me, a wave is a time domain thing but the > WaveTable object holds frequency domain data (it's the OscillatorNode that > produces the wave, not the WaveTable object). > > More precisely, the data held in the object is the Fourier series of a periodic > wave, but I guess PeriodicWaveFourierSeries is a bit too wordy to be practical? What about "HarmonicTable" ? It is, after all, a table of (relative) harmonic contributions. Ray
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 13:52:52 UTC