- From: Tom White \(MMA\) <lists@midi.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:37:26 -0700
- To: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>, <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 23:37:52 UTC
I have no opinion on the choice of the name, but would caution against picking the name on the basis of opinions represented in this wikipedia article... Having been involved in the musical instrument industry for more than 35 years I can attest to first hearing about "wavetable" synthesis in the manner used by PPG, but substantially more people heard about it as a result of the explosion of "wavetable sound cards" in the early 1990's. One can choose to decide that the first use defined the term, or one can choose to decide the most common use should be the definition... I don't think the wikipedia article authors can claim any authority over the matter. Tom White MMA It's been pointed out off-list that the WaveTable name is poor, since this name has other connotations involving synthesis techniques which sweep through through multiple waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavetable_synthesis Suggested renaming is: WaveTable -> PeriodicWave
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 23:37:52 UTC