- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:19:21 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17345-5429-CWqBznJ87N@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17345 Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |crogers@google.com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> --- Ian Hickson and I had discussed the trade-off of these two approaches a while back. He suggested that with the current approach (with create() method) that we can keep the two APIs well-factored, and not need to change the HTMLMediaElement spec. Also, I don't think that the create() approach is very complex at all. It's true that it adds one more line of JS, but this is a very small cost and it's consistent with other source nodes such as createBufferSource(). We've already had plenty of people using this API, and nobody has complained about this particular aspect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 20:19:23 UTC