- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:19:21 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-17345-5429-CWqBznJ87N@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17345
Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |crogers@google.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> ---
Ian Hickson and I had discussed the trade-off of these two approaches a while
back. He suggested that with the current approach (with create() method) that
we can keep the two APIs well-factored, and not need to change the
HTMLMediaElement spec.
Also, I don't think that the create() approach is very complex at all. It's
true that it adds one more line of JS, but this is a very small cost and it's
consistent with other source nodes such as createBufferSource().
We've already had plenty of people using this API, and nobody has complained
about this particular aspect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 20:19:23 UTC