- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:11:05 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-18332-5429-faDZTL37Ed@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18332
Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > How about being consistent by removing the "Node" suffix, leaving all the
> > "create" methods the same, except for:
> >
> > createGainNode -> createGain
> > createDelayNode -> createDelay
> >
> > createJavaScriptNode -> createScriptProcessor
> >
> > I'm less sure about the naming of "createScriptProcessor". Some have suggested
> > that we might use other scripting languages than JavaScript, so that shouldn't
> > be a part of the name.
>
> I think we need to resolve Bug 17407 before moving forward with this one.
Now that 17407 is resolved, how do the two method name-changes sound?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 20:11:09 UTC