- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:11:05 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-18332-5429-faDZTL37Ed@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18332 Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > How about being consistent by removing the "Node" suffix, leaving all the > > "create" methods the same, except for: > > > > createGainNode -> createGain > > createDelayNode -> createDelay > > > > createJavaScriptNode -> createScriptProcessor > > > > I'm less sure about the naming of "createScriptProcessor". Some have suggested > > that we might use other scripting languages than JavaScript, so that shouldn't > > be a part of the name. > > I think we need to resolve Bug 17407 before moving forward with this one. Now that 17407 is resolved, how do the two method name-changes sound? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 20:11:09 UTC