- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:21:12 -0700
- To: Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJK2wqWgF1s87ThBBgWp4K33Dbxs6JDX+6rfLDcX3B+c913S_A@mail.gmail.com>
Hmm. File a bug on the spec asking to define what happens. On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com > wrote: > oh wait, the convolver doesn't even produce any sound when there's no > buffer set. shouldn't it just produce unaltered sound? > > i can probably work around this all (unsetting their buffer) by > creating a buffer with just one 0 in it , but i still feel that the > ability to unset both would be logical. > > somewhat related: would it be an idea to give a lot of the nodes a > bypass option? > > > Peter > > 2012/7/21 Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>: > > (You might have to clear your cache before that link works correctly) > > > > 2012/7/21 Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>: > >> http://www.petervandernoord.nl/patchwork_js > >> > >> my buffersourcemodule has a pulldown to select a buffer you created > >> (add a buffer, enter a url or select a preset url with the pulldown). > >> > >> if i'm busy editing a patch, it would be nice to be able clear the > >> buffer of a buffersource module. I think that if you can set it, you'd > >> have to be able to unset it. There's no way to go back the the state > >> it was before i set a buffer. > >> > >> apart from that: my convolver module uses the same buffer-selector to > >> give it a buffer, and i cant seem to unset that one as well. with that > >> module, it probably makes more sense todo that. i can listen to thee > >> ffect of different responses, but i can't listen to the original sound > >> (without impulse response) anymore without completely removing the > >> module. > >> > >> also, there's an insonsistancy: setting the convolvernode's buffer to > >> null doesn't give me an error (and doesn't remove the buffer either). > >> > >> i think both should behave the same, and both should be able to clear > >> their buffer by setting it to null, or having a clearBuffer() method. > >> > >> > >> Peter > >> > >> 2012/7/21 Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>: > >>> Since buffersourcenodes are one-shot anyway, I'm not sure this would > make sense. > >>> > >>> On Jul 21, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Peter van der Noord < > peterdunord@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is there a way to remove the buffer of a buffersource? i tried setting > >>>> the buffer property to null, but then i get the error: > >>>> > >>>> Uncaught TypeError: Value is not of type AudioBuffer > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Peter > >>>> >
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 20:21:41 UTC