W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Clearing the buffer of a BufferSourceNode

From: Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:20:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL9tNz87S8TbhNaZVo2fxjmumePyMdULH6ZcfhwyV8QNo8JnxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
oh wait, the convolver doesn't even produce any sound when there's no
buffer set. shouldn't it just produce unaltered sound?

i can probably work around this all (unsetting their buffer) by
creating a buffer with just one 0 in it , but i still feel that the
ability to unset both would be logical.

somewhat related: would it be an idea to give a lot of the nodes a
bypass option?


2012/7/21 Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>:
> (You might have to clear your cache before that link works correctly)
> 2012/7/21 Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>:
>> http://www.petervandernoord.nl/patchwork_js
>> my buffersourcemodule has a pulldown to select a buffer you created
>> (add a buffer, enter a url or select a preset url with the pulldown).
>> if i'm busy editing a patch, it would be nice to be able clear the
>> buffer of a buffersource module. I think that if you can set it, you'd
>> have to be able to unset it. There's no way to go back the the state
>> it was before i set a buffer.
>> apart from that: my convolver module uses the same buffer-selector to
>> give it a buffer, and i cant seem to unset that one as well. with that
>> module, it probably makes more sense todo that. i can listen to thee
>> ffect of different responses, but i can't listen to the original sound
>> (without impulse response) anymore without completely removing the
>> module.
>> also, there's an insonsistancy: setting the convolvernode's buffer to
>> null doesn't give me an error (and doesn't remove the buffer either).
>> i think both should behave the same, and both should be able to clear
>> their buffer by setting it to null, or having a clearBuffer() method.
>> Peter
>> 2012/7/21 Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>:
>>> Since buffersourcenodes are one-shot anyway, I'm not sure this would make sense.
>>> On Jul 21, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is there a way to remove the buffer of a buffersource? i tried setting
>>>> the buffer property to null, but then i get the error:
>>>> Uncaught TypeError: Value is not of type AudioBuffer
>>>> Peter
Received on Saturday, 21 July 2012 17:21:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:11 UTC