- From: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:33:26 -0800
- To: Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com>
- Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <rocallahan@gmail.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 18:33:59 UTC
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com> wrote: > Hi Chris R., ROC, > > A some questions as I am working on the Spec Differences documentation: > > > ROC, I noticed I could not get access to audio data with the MediaStreams > API without using a Worker thread (using your recent builds and demos). > Jussi said he believes this the case too. Could you confirm this? If so - > is this by-design? I am trying to figure out whether there is a technical > suggestion of dropping JavaScript Processing of audio data from the > main-thread all-together, or is this was merely a matter of tackling the > Worker code as a priority. > > > Chris R., Where do we currently stand with Workers and the WebAudio API? > It looks like there has been a lot of great detail going in at the design > level, do we have an implementation that can use Workers yet? (Apologies if > there already is and I've missed it) > There is not yet an audio workers implementation in WebKit, but please follow this thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0245.html I hope this thread creates some more discussion. > > > Thanks, > > -- > Alistair MacDonald > SignedOn, Inc - W3C Audio WG > Boston, MA, (707) 701-3730 > al@signedon.com - http://signedon.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 18:33:59 UTC