- From: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:41:35 +0000
- To: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F3D159F.1000007@bbc.co.uk>
Hi all, At our meeting this week, we discussed which use cases were deemed to be "highest priority", and I took the action to look at whether the "high priority" UCs were covering a large number of our requirements. TL;DR: 23 of 28 requirements are covered by the "high priority" use cases. And there are other ways to split them which may help us with setting the "level 1" goalposts. Now for the detail: 1) I updated the wiki page for use cases and requirements with a mention of priority. At the moment, use cases 1 (Video Chat), 2 (HTML5 game with audio, effects, music) and 7 (Audio/Music visualization) are HIGH priority, and UC6 (Wavetable synthesis of a virtual music instrument) is MEDIUM priority. All the others (including the newly added use case 13 for audio recording+saving) are LOW priority. These priorities have gone unchallenged since the meeting on Monday, and since my pointer to the minutes two days ago, so I assume we have consensus? 2) I made a detailed mapping of the 13 uses cases and 28 requirements. See e.g: http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements#UC1_.E2.80.94_Related_Requirements This is the part which I have done in good faith but I am sure there are mistakes. There were many use cases where it wasn't entirely clear whether “Modularity of Transformation" was required, or "Dynamic Compression" (the latter because I am not enough of an expert to be certain). Likewise, some of our requirements (such as "Audio Quality") are very vague and hardly usable, and others (“Support for basic polyphony” and “Mixing Sources”) are near-equivalent. That said, I think the map is a flawed but reasonable approximation of the territory. I have re-mapped it to the table I had sent a couple of weeks ago. I am attaching the latest version to this mail. The visual representation makes it easy to know which requirements are associated with more or fewer use cases. Interestingly, if I count only whether a requirement is associated to a high priority use case, I find that 23 out of the 28 we have are. The exceptions: * Playback rate adjustment * Dynamic range compression (possibly my mistake) * Generation of common signals for synthesis and parameter modulation purposes * The ability to read in standard definitions of wavetable instruments * Acceptable performance of synthesis Alternatively, we could split requirements thus: * 9 Requirements are shared by more than half of the UCs Support for primary audio file formats Playing / Looping sources of audio Support for basic polyphony Audio quality Modularity of transformations Transformation parameter automation Gain adjustment Filtering Mixing Sources * 14 Requirements shared by less than half of the Use Cases, but required by HIGH priority UCs One source, many sounds Capture of audio from microphone, line in, other inputs Sample-accurate scheduling of playback Buffering Rapid scheduling of many independent sources Triggering of audio sources Spatialization Noise gating The simulation of acoustic spaces The simulation of occlusions and obstructions Ducking Echo cancellation Level detection Frequency domain analysis * 5 Requirements shared by less than half of the UCs and not required by HIGH priority UCs Dynamic range compression Playback rate adjustment Generation of common signals for synthesis and parameter modulation purposes The ability to read in standard definitions of wavetable instruments Acceptable performance of synthesis Thoughts? Opinion on whether this is helpful? Glaring mistakes in the process? Other ways you'd go at it? Thanks, -- Olivier
Attachments
- text/html attachment: Audio-UseCases-Requirements-Map.html
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 14:42:08 UTC