- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:13:51 -0400
- To: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- CC: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>, Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Hi, folks- On 6/1/12 11:17 AM, olivier Thereaux wrote: > Philip, > > On 1 Jun 2012, at 15:41, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >> We're not able to attend weekly teleconferences at this hour. > > We are not talking about a weekly teleconference, but a short series > to cover the most difficult issues. > >> Of the 8 issues of the agenda [1] we only covered 1, but that is >> still being discussed on the mailing list. While some things are >> easier to clear up via phone, it really seems wise to only use >> teleconference time for things where we've failed to reach >> agreement on the list, where all issues can be discussed in >> parallel. > > If I were cynical I could have picked 10 of the editorial/typo issues > and claim that calls are awesomely efficient. But as Chris mentioned > on the call, we picked the most difficult of the list, and managed to > reached a tentative resolution in 30 minutes or so. > > True not everyone could be on the call and as a result the > discussions are still ongoing, but it is undeniable that the call > helped us make progress in a way that two weeks of back-and-forths on > the list certainly wouldn't. I strongly agree with Olivier here. Teleconference are very useful, and it's only an hour a week. Telcons are good not only for the high-bandwidth, back-and-forth technical discussion and nuance that email doesn't capture well, but also for the socialization of a group, helping resolve tensions, and in building consensus. (Not as good as F2Fs, but far cheaper.) We're not just trying to create a specification here, but trying to build a group that can work together efficiently. As I said on the call, we can always keep the conversation going via email, but telcons help immensely. >> (A bug tracker would be even better, though.) > > I'm happy for us to look into it. Doug, Thierry, could you talk to > the systems team and get an idea of how hard it would be to migrate > our tracker issues to a public bugzilla instance? Knowing if they > have a tool to migrate automatically would help us decide if it is > reasonable to consider the switch at all. That's a reasonable idea, and I've asked our Systems Team to look into it. I'll let you know what they say, but I suspect it shouldn't be too hard to export and import issues, if Bugzilla has any kind of API. Regards- -Doug
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 18:14:02 UTC