W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Proposed clarification to our issues process

From: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0EC044D1-4093-4777-BC02-FCF07C127E42@bbc.co.uk>
To: "Wei, James" <james.wei@intel.com>

On 28 May 2012, at 01:46, Wei, James wrote:
> Will it be better to let the one who raised the issue to close it? and the issue will be closed automatically if it is under Pending Review status for several weeks. 

Yes. I think we'll probably settle for a mix.

* Some issues will be closed by the chairs for lack of objection after a while, or if clear consensus is reached on the list or in a teleconference.

* Some will be closed by the person who raised them if the resolution satisfies them

So long as the status changes and their rationale is clearly documented, either should be perfectly fine.

Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 10:43:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:04 UTC