- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 10:15:07 +0200
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "Chris Rogers" <crogers@google.com>, "olivier Thereaux" <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "Audio Working Group" <public-audio@w3.org>
On Fri, 25 May 2012 12:45:26 +0200, olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > > On 22 May 2012, at 11:07, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> I hope that most of the issues raised recently can be resolved without >> discussion. So, personally I think it would be fine if the editor (or >> his delegate(s)) simply checked in a change to the spec and moved the >> issue directly from Raised to Closed, preferably with a link to the >> Mercurial changeset that resolves the issue. If the change is not >> acceptable then someone can reopen the issue (I assume). > > Chris has already started adding mercurial change set links in issue > comments, which helps greatly. Chris, can you make sure to set the issue > status as "Pending Review" when you consider that the change set(s) > address all concerns? I've made sure all the changesets up to now were > reflected on tracker. > > Our request to have status changes sent to the list automatically has > been put by the w3c systems team on a backlog. In the meantime, I have > started doing it by hand with the help of a little web-scraping script > (attached, FYI). > > Do people prefer if I send notifications on the list about each item, or > would you rather receive a bulk update of all the issues which have been > set as "pending review" in the past n days? I prefer what you've been doing, so that one can reply directly to that message and keep things in the correct thread. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 08:15:43 UTC