W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Proposed clarification to our issues process

From: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:05:10 +0100
Cc: Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6458BEE5-82E3-4058-A2CE-A5D3CB982D52@bbc.co.uk>
To: <robert@ocallahan.org>

On 22 May 2012, at 11:07, Robert O'Callahan wrote:

> I hope that most of the issues raised recently can be resolved without discussion. So, personally I think it would be fine if the editor (or his delegate(s)) simply checked in a change to the spec and moved the issue directly from Raised to Closed, preferably with a link to the Mercurial changeset that resolves the issue. If the change is not acceptable then someone can reopen the issue (I assume).

Entirely agree on the fact that Raised->Open->Pending Review can be done in a matter of minutes by the editor if the resolution is just a matter of fixing a paragraph in the spec. 

I'm still rather keen on making sure there is some kind of group review, even short, before the issue can be closed, though.

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 11:05:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:04 UTC