- From: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:52:19 +0100
- To: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>, <robert@ocallahan.org>, Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com>, <public-audio@w3.org>
On 21 May 2012, at 10:10, Jussi Kalliokoski wrote: >> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: >> >> Have decisions been made in the teleconferences or via email so far? Our typical process has been: * Discuss on the mailing-list * Reach consensus and take decision during the teleconference Obviously we understand that given timezones, not everyone in the group may have joined the teleconference, and we've strictly documented meeting minutes and given people ample time to object to a teleconference resolution if they weren't there. It has served us well so far. > I have to say I agree, the main reason for me joining most of the calls has been so that I don't miss on any decisions that are being made. For me, the mailing list feels like a more productive discussion environment. Agreed. The mailing-list has been a wonderful discussion environment, and that is where most of the exchanges have been happening. The teleconferences, OTOH, have been an efficient decision making one. Olivier
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 10:52:47 UTC