Several of these reviews were sent directly to this list. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>wrote: > On 05/15/2012 07:00 PM, Alistair MacDonald wrote: > >> Is the reason that the Web Audio API has been implemented for longer time? >>> >> >> I would say no. The reviews from companies I saw were after a >> MediaStreams build and documentation were available. >> >> >> This is the part I'm not really aware of. What industry and why? >>> >> >> Primarily game and music companies. Only games companies, to my >> knowledge, made an effort to review the specs. >> > So some important feedback is clearly missing. > > > > >> The Web Audio API's features were closer to the needs of the industry >> members that contacted the group. When companies contacted me about >> the work, I asked them to review both specs; >> > Are the reviews available somewhere? > > > > however they chose not to >> review the MediaStreams API because it was not a good fit for the >> kinds of projects they work on. >> >> One of the most desired features/complaints was real streaming support >> from the Web Audio API, so that developers do not have to download >> content up-front, especially important in low-bandwidth situations. >> >> >> Hope that helps >> >> -- >> Al >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 16:55:52 UTC