- From: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 18:59:36 +0100
- To: Tony Ross <tross@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 18:00:09 UTC
Hi Tony, On 07/05/2012 18:51, Tony Ross wrote: >> 1) Keep the noteOn/noteOff methods as deprecated (which would be a >> little strange in a first official version of the spec) >> 2) Remove them altogether (which may be a problem given the many >> implementations of the draft spec) >> 3) Keep them but mention that they may be deprecated in the future, and >> that start/stop is preferred > > I tend to lean toward option #2, maybe with an informative note stating that earlier drafts of the spec used "noteOn"/"noteOff". Overall it feels a bit early to leave this kind of legacy as a normative part of the standard. That said I'll admit I don't know how many implementations of the current draft spec we're talking about. AFAIK there is one (or 2 depending on how you count) implementation(s) of the API in browsers, but Chris was worried about the number of content pages using the feature. I suspect many of those are demos. Olivier
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 18:00:09 UTC