W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

RE: Audio-ISSUE-12 (Joe Berkovitz): Loop start/stop points [Web Audio API]

From: Tony Ross <tross@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:51:54 +0000
To: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C5EA8F3A4B854B4386C8C7AEDA1A90501A5570C7@TK5EX14MBXC226.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

> From: olivier Thereaux [mailto:olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:38 PM

> If we are to resolve this issue with the addition of the start/stop
> methods, we will need to decide what to do with the noteOn/noteOff ones.

I definitely favor the addition of the "start" and "stop" methods and expect the re-name should lead to less confusion among developers. I know it took me a moment to realize what "noteOn" and "noteOff" were for the first time I read the spec.

> Several options were considered:
> 1) Keep the noteOn/noteOff methods as deprecated (which would be a
> little strange in a first official version of the spec)
> 2) Remove them altogether (which may be a problem given the many
> implementations of the draft spec)
> 3) Keep them but mention that they may be deprecated in the future, and
> that start/stop is preferred

I tend to lean toward option #2, maybe with an informative note stating that earlier drafts of the spec used "noteOn"/"noteOff". Overall it feels a bit early to leave this kind of legacy as a normative part of the standard. That said I'll admit I don't know how many implementations of the current draft spec we're talking about.

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 17:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:04 UTC