- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:09:58 -0500
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: public-audio@w3.org
Hi, folks- On 11/9/11 9:54 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 11/08/2011 05:34 PM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >> PlH, >> >> Prior to the transition request for the Audio API first draft, I would >> like to secure an archived record of the Domain Lead' approval of the >> title, and shortname. >> >> title: Audio API 1.0 >> shortname: http://www.w3.org/TR/audio-api-1.0/ > > Is it common to include version numbers in the shortname? > The webrtc group's API (http://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/) did not. No, not really... how about shortname: "audioapi"? >> A draft is now available in group space at >> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/drafts/1WD/ Looks good, Thierry. I do have a few small suggestions: * since we are doing the somewhat unusual practice of publishing two different proposals concurrently, we should have a statement about how we plan to resolve the issue, how people should review the proposals, and perhaps other details like implementation status; I'd also like to see a more comparative description, since the two proposal descriptions are apples and oranges. * there's a strange style rule that reduces the paragraph margins and makes it harder to read: li, p { margin-bottom: 0.3em; margin-top: 0.3em; } Could we get rid of that for <p>? * we acknowledge public-audio@w3.org, which is good... we should also acknowledge the former Incubator group public-xg-audio@w3.org. * the acknowledgments are marked non-normative, but actually, the whole introduction is non-normative. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Developer Relations Project Coordinator, SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio WGs
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 16:10:10 UTC