Re: Please read: 1.3 prioritization action items for all ARIA working group members

I think this project and the keywords only exist in the aria repo, not the other repos like core-aam, so I've started adding these keywords (as needed) to the Core-AAM issues in ARIA 1.3. Please speak up if that’s not the expected path forward.

Thanks,
James Craig


> On Jun 30, 2022, at 12:19 PM, Valerie Young <spectranaut@igalia.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> In today's meeting we discuss the next step for prioritizing all 116 issues marked with milestone 1.3. We'd like to release the features we have already added in 1.3 soon so we don't think it's reasonable to address all these issues in 1.3. After you take the steps outline in this email, we hope it will be clear which issues we can punt.
> 
> Step one: find all issues with the 1.3 tag that are assigned to you <https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22ARIA+1.3%22+assignee%3AYOU>.
> Step two: Add the following labels to each of the issues assigned to you (add more than one label as appropriate).
> Labels related to the type of fix, almost every issue should have one of these:
> 
> editorial
> The issue requires only a change to an example, note, spelling, grammar, or is related to publishing or git repository maintenance.
> clarification
> The issue is related to clarifying or correcting language that is either confusing, misleading or under-specified. It does not result in a change to any implementations or APG.
> feature
> This issue introduces new concepts that will need implementations or design patterns in APG.
> Labels related to priority:
> 
> high author impact
> This is a high priority issue that solves a real problem for authors.
> high user impact
> This is a high priority issue that solves a real problem for AT users.
> openui
> The issue came from OpenUI.
> Miscellaneous labels:
> 
> good first issue
> The issue is probably easy and straight forward.
> F2FCandidate
> This issue could be a subject for the next TPAC.
> nit
> honestly I don't know who wanted this one or why it is different then editorial, someone could chime in, or if you feel it is relevant, add it
> Please make time for this in the next couple of weeks! :) Some issues will be obvious, but some might take some thinking.
> 
> Valerie
>