- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 13:37:50 +0100
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@google.com>
- Cc: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Thanks Cynthia, your review is appreciated. I've added the a11y-needs-resolution label to all three issues, and will leave the editors to respond. Léonie. On 08/05/2021 04:03, Cynthia Shelly wrote: > I've reviewed the draft, and we discussed it in an ARIA meeting. I've > put in 3 issues. I don't seem to have permissions to label them. > > Here are the issues: > > https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/317 > <https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/317> > https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/318 > <https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/318> > https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/319 > <https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues/319> > > I hope this is useful! > > Cynthia > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:07 AM Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com>> wrote: > > Thanks Cynthia. > > The WD is here: > https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/> > > If the ARIA WG has comments or issues, the process is to file them on > the spec repo: > https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues > <https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/issues> > > Then to add one of the a11y labels to each issue: > https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/labels > <https://github.com/w3c/html-aria/labels> > > If you could also reply here to let us know the ARIA WG has reviewed, > that'd be great. > > Thanks again. > > Léonie. > > On 19/04/2021 17:58, Cynthia Shelly wrote: > > Hi Leonie, > > > > Yes, I can review it next week. It's good for me to read through > some of > > these docs, since I haven't worked with them for a while. > > What's the current process for logging issues and feedback? Can > you send > > me a link to the version in need of review? > > > > Cynthia > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:53 AM Léonie Watson > <lwatson@tetralogical.com <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com> > > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com>>> wrote: > > > > Thanks Cynthia. > > > > We were originally hoping for review by 2 April, and now by > the end of > > this week. But having a review from the ARIA WG is worth waiting > > for, so > > would next week be possible perhaps? > > > > Léonie. > > > > On 19/04/2021 17:34, Cynthia Shelly wrote: > > > Hi Leonie, > > > What's the timeline for the review? I'd like to take a > look, but I'm > > > slammed this week. > > > Thanks, > > > Cynthia > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 4:16 AM Léonie Watson > > <lwatson@tetralogical.com <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com> > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com>> > > > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com> > > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com > <mailto:lwatson@tetralogical.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hello ARIA WG, > > > > > > We're following up on our request for horizontal review of > > ARIA in > > > HTML. > > > We'd appreciate your comments or, if you do not expect to > > review the > > > specification, your confirmation. > > > > > > With thanks, > > > Léonie > > > -- > > > Director @TetraLogical > > > https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/> > <https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/>> > > <https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/> > <https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/>>> > > > > > > > -- > > Director @TetraLogical > > https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/> > <https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/>> > > > > -- > Director @TetraLogical > https://tetralogical.com/ <https://tetralogical.com/> > -- Director @TetraLogical https://tetralogical.com
Received on Saturday, 8 May 2021 12:38:06 UTC