- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 08:33:21 +0100
- To: James Nurthen <nurthen@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>, "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+V=cN_0sPKgtJFxitz6Xf8VGm8tTuwksM1AdgXvYQMKwmg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, the ARIA in HTML spec may be helpful in this regard as it maps roles to content kind and provides nesting restrictions for HTML content. Refer to the last 2 columns of the ARIA states and properties table under https://w3c.github.io/html-aria/#allowed-aria-roles-states-and-properties -- Regards SteveF Accessibility is political[image: ✊] Working for the web <https://twitter.com/stevefaulkner/status/940835584410574850>, anywhere and everywhere [image: 🖖🏽] On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 17:13, James Nurthen <nurthen@adobe.com> wrote: > HTML defines its validation model – for the <a> element it is at > > > > > https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element > > > > The <a> element allows the following content model > > Transparent <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#transparent>, > but there must be no interactive content > <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#interactive-content-2> > or a > <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/text-level-semantics.html#the-a-element> element > descendants. > > > > So <button> is not allowed as a child of <a> as it is interactive content. > > > > ARIA likewise defines its own validation rules. There is currently no > concept like content model in html except for the following: > > - Children Presentational: True > - Roles which have required child elements > > Neither of these fits for links. You are welcome to file an issue to > create something like a content model in ARIA. > > > > My non chair hat opinion is that this is a bit of a heavy solution. I > certainly don’t want to replicate the specifics of HTML’s child content > model as not all of the reasons are accessibility related. We only want to > prohibit content which is problematic for accessibility. > > > > With my chair hat on we will of course consider any proposals but this > will not be in the 1.2 timeframe. > > > > Regards, > > James > > > > *James Nurthen* | Accessibility Engineer | Adobe | p. > 415.832.2734 | c. 415.987.1918 | nurthen@adobe.com > > > > > > > > *From: *"Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 8:33 AM > *To: *James Nurthen <nurthen@adobe.com> > *Cc: *"public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org> > *Subject: *ARIA role nesting and validation > > > > Hi James, > > > > I’ve noticed that > > > > <div role="link"> > > <div role="button">Foo</div> > > </div> > > > > In https://validator.nu/ does not give any error whereas > > > > <a href=http://somewhere.com> > > < button>Bar</button> > > </a> > > > > is reported as > > > > “Error: The element button must not appear as a descendant of the a > element.” > > > > I think this goes deep. > > > > Isn’t it so that the same forbidden nesting rules for HTML also must apply > for ARIA role nesting? > > Can anybody point me to the location in the ARIA spec that says that > explicitly? > > If not, were there any reasons that prohibited that? > > > > But if so, isn’t this a bug for validators github? > > And where is the reference overview of allowed/forbidden HTML nestings? > > > > I would be VERY happy if we can clarify this. > > > > Regards > > Stefan >
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2019 07:34:22 UTC