Re: Microsoft's ARIA annotations proposal

Dear all,

As former co-chair and editor of those specifications, I'm very happy to
answer questions about the the Web Annotation work.  Reading the position
paper from Microsoft, I don't see anything that cannot be accommodated.
Microsoft even hosted one of the Annotation WG outreach events in Berlin,
in 2016, for which we were and remain very grateful.

Kindest regards,

Rob Sanderson



On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <
tsiegman@wiley.com> wrote:

> I just want to make sure this group is familiar with W3C’s Web Annotation
> Data Model https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/. I’ve copied Rob
> Sanderson who helped author it.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tzviya Siegman*
>
> Information Standards Lead
>
> Wiley
>
> 201-748-6884
>
> tsiegman@wiley.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Aaron Leventhal [mailto:aleventhal@google.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2018 10:36 AM
> *To:* ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Microsoft's ARIA annotations proposal
>
>
>
> Hello, I was reading the ARIA annotations issue
> <https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/749> and the linked Microsoft
> Position Paper on Annotations
> <https://www.w3.org/2014/04/annotation/submissions/Microsoft_Position_Paper_on_Annotations.pdf>
> .
>
>
>
> All I can say is, yes, we need this. With perhaps a few minor tweaks, the
> proposal is already pretty solid. It would solve a lot of real problems in
> group document editors. This would be very helpful for end users.
>
>
>
> I'd like to see annotations sooner than the 1.4 time frame, and look
> forward to implementing in Chrome, and working with platform API specs and
> AT vendors as well.
>
>
>
> I propose we get this on the agenda for an upcoming meeting.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049