- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 12:05:52 -0700
- To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7wsiPvUQM8dN0txsnzoTa17nRo1GkOdM2h-r2MvC+MfEg@mail.gmail.com>
On last week's ARIA working group telcon, it was decided to ask the group to advance the Graphics ARIA and Graphics AAM specs to Candidate Recommendation status: https://www.w3.org/2018/03/01-aria-minutes.html#item02 There were a few outstanding clean-up edits I had on my ToDo list for the Graphics ARIA spec, and a few more that I discovered when I started working on them. Those were pushed to the repo yesterday, so if you reviewed the Editor's Draft last week it will have changed slightly: https://w3c.github.io/graphics-aria/ The edits don't affect any normative aspects of these specs; they mostly involve cleaning up the examples & ReSpec formatting. One of the changes closes the only open issue on either spec, about avoiding aria-flowto ( https://github.com/w3c/graphics-aria/issues/1). I also removed an editor's note about adding a more detailed canvas example, since the canvas hit regions spec has been rolled back. See the commit messages for more details: https://github.com/ w3c/graphics-aria/commits/master For working group members, the Call for Consensus on the CR transition request is still active on the admin mailing list. ~Amelia
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2018 19:06:21 UTC