- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:51:31 -0400
- To: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>
- Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
Hey Dominic (and Alex): When you get a chance, could you please look at this issue: https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/538 My understanding from today's meeting, and from Joseph Scheuhammer, is that the intended meaning of "child node" in Step 2F is "DOM child node." The spec just fails to make that explicit. Firefox is using that interpretation, but Chrome is not. And since you were the one to make the change in Chrome [1], we wanted to get your insight and opinion. If you feel that the DOM-child-only interpretation is reasonable, we'd like to make that change to the AccName AAM 1.1 spec prior to our transitioning it to CR. On the other hand, if you feel like your implementation is the right way to go, we need to discuss it and reach consensus. Thanks in advance for your time. --joanie [1] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=561766
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2017 17:52:17 UTC